Supreme Court to hear urgently Naresh Sharma plea against his non-selection in Paralympic, Tokyo 2020

After the plea was brought in front of bench headed by Justice Ramana, the matter has been listed for urgent hearing before three judge bench today.
The paralympian(petitioner in this case) has challenged the Delhi High Court, request saying, however it held that the PCI has violated its own criteria for choosing the group for 2020 Tokyo Paralympics, but failed to understand the urgency and importance of the matter.

Naresh Kumar Sharma,Five-time Paralympian shooter and Arjuna Awardee winner ,has moved to the Supreme Court for  his discretionary non-selection for the Tokyo Paralympic Games 2020 by the selection committee for the Paralympics games.

The applicant has challenged the Delhi High Court, request saying however it held the PCI acted infringing upon its own measures for choosing the group for 2020 Tokyo Paralympics, it didn’t consider the gravity and earnestness of the matter. “The petitioner humbly seeks intervention of this court in the present matter as the legitimate opportunity of the petitioner to participate in Tokyo Paralympics in R7 event and consequently bring laurels to the country will be lost if the arbitrary, discriminatory and capricious selection of the shooter in R7 event by the selection committee of PCI is allowed,” the plea said.The shooter said a division bench of HC had on July 30 sought responses from the PCI and the centre.

During the July 30 hearing under the steady gaze of the supreme court, Sharma said that the last date of choice for shooting in Tokyo Paralympic is August 2 and if the matter is heard on August 6, it would make the request infructuous. He has additionally looked for reactions from the PCI and appeal against its single-judge order which had refused to meddle with his non-selection for the games.

The Guidance had encouraged the high court to list the matter on an early date, notwithstanding, the seat had said the candidate ought to have moved toward the court somewhat prior and not without a delay, nonetheless, court wouldn’t meddle with the determination of the other player over Sharma at this late stage, noticing that the shooting crew was at that point in an air pocket.

It, in any case, had asked the Union Ministry of Sports to inspect the whole matter and make a move, if important.

Join Lawcutor on whatsapp for more updates

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s