GHAZIABAD CASE:- NO BASIC FACTS IN FIR BY UP POLICE

The Karnataka High Court lashed out at the UP Police without ascertaining even the basic facts about Manish and Twitter India’s culpability in the matter.

The judge specifically asked, Whether Twitter India is capable of controlling the content?
The court questioned
“What is the allegation against Twitter India? How does the complainant connect Twitter India.

The judge lashed out the UP Police counsel:-
Don’t bring in IT Rules now. IT Rules will not come here,” the Judge lashed out at UP Police’s counsel asking him not to mix up Twitter India and Twitter INC.

Senior Advocate CV Nagesh, had argued that Maheshwari is merely an employee of the company and he had no control over the video of the Ghaziabad.

UP Police on the other hand claimed the 41A notice was issued to the Petitioner only in a representative capacity and their aim is to merely identify Twitter India head, for which they seek the Petitioner’s cooperation.

The UP Police submitted that notice was issued to the Petitioner as he is named head of Twitter India.

Maintainability:-
The High Court also heard the UP Police on issue of territorial jurisdiction.

Join us on whatsapp

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s