Fire-Arm License To Flaunt/Parade publically As Fashion Trend: Madhya Pradesh HC To Authorities

Case –Gurdeep Singh Dhinjal Vs.State of M.P.& ors

The Bench of Justice S.A.Dharmadhikari remarked:

“It is presently a settled law that as possession of a non-prohibited fire-arm helps build a person’s right to protect himself, the proper is taken into thought as fundamental right under Article 21 of Constitution of of India, subject to cheap restrictions.”

Further, observant that granting a licence need to be the rule & refusal in exception, for reasons to be recorded in writing, the court said.

Section 13of the Arms Act deals with the grant of license and Section 14 of the Arms Act is relating to the refusal of the license.

Importantly, the Court said:
“If the absence of threat to the property is not a criterion for refusal of a licence, it will even be found inferentially that absence of threat to the person of the human would be no criteria for refusal of the licence”

Observing this, the Court noted that there do not appear to be any factors that build the petitioner unsuitable or incompetent for effort and possessing a gun licence.

Accordingly, the impugned order was put aside & the State Authorities were directed to rethink the claim of the petitioner in accordance with section 14.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s