Delhi police moves Sc against High Court Orders Granting bail to Devangana Kalita, Natasha Narwal and Asif Iqbal Tanha

The Delhi High Court ruled on June 15 that student leaders Asif Iqbal Tanha, Natasha Narwal, and Devangana Kalita did not face charges under the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA) in the Delhi riots conspiracy case.

The High Court has conducted a factual examination of the allegations in three separate orders granting bail to Tanha, Narwal, and Kalita to determine if a prima facie case is made out against them for the purposes of Section 43D(5) of UAPA. In addition, the High Court made important observations about the fundamental right to protest and the frivolous use of UAPA to stifle citizens’ dissent.

The Delhi Police had filed charges against them, alleging that their protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act, which began in December 2019, were part of a “larger conspiracy” behind the communal riots in North East Delhi in the last week of February 2020.

Following a preliminary examination of the chargesheet, a High Court bench comprised of Justices Siddharth Mridul and Anup Jairam Bhambhani concluded that the allegations do not prima facie constitute the alleged UAPA offences relating to terrorist activities (Sections 15,17 and 18).

As a result, the division bench ruled that the accused were not subject to the rigours of Section 43D(5) of the UAPA, and thus they were entitled to bail under ordinary principles under the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Join Lawcutor on Whatsapp for more update.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s