Supreme Court: Payment of extortion money does not amount to terror funding

Case – Sudesh Kedia v. Union of India

The accused is a Ranchi- based coal businessman. He was booked for offences under Unlawful Activities Prevention Act

The charges against him were filed under:
Section 17 (punishment for funding terrorist acts); Section 18 (punishment for conspiracy)and Section 21 (punishment for proceeding terrorism)of the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act.

His bail application was rejected by a Special Judge NIA, Ranchi. The application was also dismissed by the High Court as it was found that he was paying extortion money which amounted to the funding a terror gang, Tritiya Prastuti Committee (TPC).

The present appeal was heard in the Supreme Court by a Bench consisting of Justice L Nageshwar Rao and Justice S.Ravindra Bhat.

In the plea, the petitioner stated that he was not a part of TPC and not funding the terror group.
He further stated that the amount paid to TPC was for ensuring the smooth functioning of his business and he could not transport coal without meeting the needs of TPC.

The Bench observed that as per Section 43 (5) D, the Court is bound to examine the entire material on record for satisfying itself.

The Bench stated that the Court is not satisfied with the case of conspiracy and mere payment of extortion money does not amount to terror funding.

Therefore, the Court set aside the order of the High Court and directed to release the accused on bail.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s