UNILATERAL WITHDRAWAL OF CONSENT FROM JOINT DIVORCE PETITION, AFTER THE OTHER PARTY HAS PERFORMED OBLIGATIONS UNDER AGREEMENT, CANNOT BE PERMITTED

The kerala High Court has delivered a notable judgement holding that unilateral withdrawal of consent by a spouse from a joint petition filed for divorce, after the other party has performed his/her obligations under the agreement is unsustainable in law.

The Court termed it a “Sharp Practice”, which cannot be permitted or tolerated for moment as it would shatter the faith of litigant in the justice deliver system and mockery of Alternative Dispute Resolution mechanism.

Once the parties agree to file a joint Petition, pursuant to an agreement/compromise in pending proceedings , then the parties are estopped from withdrawing from agreement, the court held categorically.
“…..we hold that once the parties agree to file a joint petition, pursuant to an agreement or compromise in pending proceeding, then the parties are estopped from resiling from agreement. Therefore, the unilateral withdrawal of consent by the respondent, especially after the appellant has performed his part of terms in the memorandum of agreement, is only a sharp practice which cannot be permitted or tolerated for a moment as it would shatter the faith of the litigants in the justice delivery system and make a mockery of Alternative Dispute Resolution mechanism”, observed a division bench comprising justice A M Muhammed Mustaque and CS Dias.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s