The Supreme Court rules that there will be no bar on granting anticipatory bail in triple talaq cases.Supreme Court:

There is no bar in granting bail under the Muslim Women (protection of Right on Marriage) Act. But provided one condition should be satisfied, the Muslim women, the complainant has to be heard by the competent court before granting such anticipatory bail.

Also, the bench consisting of Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, Indu Malhotra and Indira Banerjee observed that the ad-interim relief can be granted by the court at its discretion. But the notice regarding the same should be provided to the aggrieved party (married women).

The harmonious construction of Section 438 of Criminal Procedure Code and the Section 7(c) of the Act places a strong view that there is no bar in granting anticipatory bail for the offences committed under the Act. In the case, the mother-in law of the married Muslim woman had filed an appeal from the order of Kerala High court.

The Husband of the woman has remarried after pronouncing triple talaq. He was charged under Section 498A of Indian Penal Code and the provisions of the Muslim Women (protection of Right on Marriage) Act. The pronouncement of Talaq was rendered void and illegal under Section of 2019 Act. The Kerala High Court has declined to grant anticipatory bail. Hence, the aggrieved party has approached the Supreme Court.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s